Ajit Agarkar Under Fire: Why Is the Chief Selector Being Blamed for Virat Kohli’s Test Retirement?

Virat Kohli’s retirement from Test cricket continues to spark debate, with former India opener Wasim Jaffer now questioning the circumstances surrounding the star batter’s decision. More than a year after Kohli stepped away from the longest format, Jaffer has suggested that the way the former India captain was treated may have contributed to his departure, bringing chief selector Ajit Agarkar into the discussion.
Speaking on his YouTube channel, Jaffer indicated that Kohli appeared to have more Test cricket left in him and was preparing for India’s tour of England before announcing his retirement. His comments have reignited questions about whether Indian cricket could have handled the situation differently.
Wasim Jaffer Questions How Virat Kohli Was Treated
Jaffer believes Kohli’s standing in Indian cricket makes his retirement particularly significant. The former opener pointed out that Kohli is not only an accomplished batter but also a major attraction for cricket fans, whose presence can draw large crowds to stadiums.
“It felt like Virat was a bit bitter about the way he was treated. A player like Virat brings people to the ground. He has such a following. He definitely could have played more Test cricket. Till we hear it from Virat's mouth, we won't know. He was preparing for the England tour,” Jaffer said.

His remarks suggest that Kohli’s exit may have involved more than a simple decision to move away from international red-ball cricket. However, Jaffer also acknowledged that the complete picture remains unclear, stressing that Kohli himself would be the best person to explain what ultimately led to his decision.
Ajit Agarkar Comes Under Scrutiny
Jaffer’s comments have put Ajit Agarkar, India’s chief selector, under the spotlight amid renewed discussion about Kohli’s Test retirement. The suggestion that the batter may have felt unhappy with how he was treated has raised questions about the communication between the team management, selectors and one of Indian cricket’s most influential players.

However, Jaffer’s remarks do not establish that Agarkar directly caused Kohli’s retirement. The former opener expressed his interpretation of the circumstances rather than presenting confirmed details of a disagreement between the two.
Without a direct explanation from Kohli, the precise reasons behind his decision remain a matter of speculation. It would therefore be premature to attribute his retirement to any single individual.
Kohli Was Preparing for the England Test Tour
One of the most notable aspects of Jaffer’s statement was his claim that Kohli had been preparing for the England tour. The timing has added another dimension to the discussion, as it raises questions about when the batter made his final decision to walk away from Test cricket.
Kohli had been a central figure in India’s Test setup for more than a decade, leading the team through several important phases and helping establish a greater emphasis on fitness and aggressive cricket. His experience and leadership made him a significant presence in the dressing room, while his batting record cemented his place among India’s leading modern-era Test players.
Jaffer’s comments have consequently prompted discussion over whether Kohli might have continued in the format had the circumstances been different. Still, the fact that he was reportedly preparing for the tour does not, by itself, reveal why he ultimately chose retirement.